As dog owners, it's natural to wonder how our dogs stack up against others. Are they smart? Loyal? Skilled? Often, people turn to canine IQ tests, such as those devised by Stanley Coren (2006), to measure their dog’s intelligence. However, these assessments primarily evaluate how well a dog can perform tasks requested by humans, not necessarily what they’re inherently good at or how they naturally think and learn. So, when we ask, "Is my dog better than yours?" perhaps the real question should be, "Better at what?"
The Problem with Traditional IQ Tests for Dogs
The methods commonly used to measure a dog’s intelligence revolve around their ability to learn, understand, recall, and perform tasks under human instruction. For example, a working and obedience test might measure how well a dog follows a finger point or responds to a cue to perform a specific behaviour (Coren, 2006).
The issue? These tests only highlight a dog’s willingness to interact with humans. They neglect other forms of intelligence, such as instinctive intelligence (what a dog is bred to do naturally) and adaptive intelligence (how a dog solves problems on their own). As a result, a dog who excels in these areas might be unfairly labelled as "less intelligent" simply because they don’t care to follow human directions.
Understanding the Whole Dog: Instincts and Input
Lea and Osthaus (2018) argue that to truly appreciate a dog's intelligence, we need to look beyond obedience. It's essential to consider whether the stimuli we present are relevant to the dog and what the dog can do with those inputs. After all, dogs communicate and process the world in ways vastly different from humans.
For instance, as of 2016, there wasn’t a reliable test for assessing a dog's olfactory intelligence, or their ability to identify and analyse scents (Polgár et al., 2016). Even if such a test existed, we wouldn’t know if the chosen scent would be enticing to the dog or something they’d naturally avoid.
The effectiveness of any intelligence test also hinges on various factors, including a dog’s learning style, memory retention, attention span, and personality. Dogs, much like humans, have individual strengths and preferences, and these nuances can greatly influence their performance in any test (Polgár et al., 2016).
Why Hounds Perform Poorly on IQ Tests
Take hounds, for example. They’re often at the bottom of rankings for working and obedience intelligence. Why? Because these tests were never designed with their natural abilities in mind. Hounds have been bred for generations to excel at scent detection and tracking. Unlike dogs bred for close human interaction, hounds are programmed to work independently, leading hunters to their prey without waiting for directions (DK, 2015).
Once a hound picks up a scent, their genetic instincts kick in. They follow the trail to its source, shutting out all other sensory inputs—including cues from humans (Turcheck, 2022). This single-minded focus, while frustrating for those expecting traditional obedience, demonstrates a level of instinctual intelligence that’s nothing short of remarkable.
In fact, studies show that breeds like Basset Hounds are far less likely to play fetch with their owners but are incredibly effective in fieldwork such as fox hunts (Morrill et al., 2022; Britannica, 2019). This highlights how instinctual intelligence often clashes with human-centric notions of what makes a dog "smart."
A Matter of Evolution and Purpose
Dogs have been selectively bred for specific roles, and this deeply influences their intelligence profiles. For example:
Collies: Bred for visual work, collies excel at tasks requiring acute attention to movement and visual cues.
Hounds: Designed for scent work, hounds are masters of olfactory processing, often picking up and analysing hundreds of scents at once (Richard, 2023).
These evolutionary paths mean that expecting a Basset Hound to respond like a Border Collie in an IQ test is as unfair as expecting a boxer to excel at scent detection. Each breed has evolved for a distinct purpose, and their intelligence should be assessed accordingly.
The Case for Instinctual Intelligence
Richard (2023) argues that instinctual intelligence should be celebrated rather than dismissed. Hounds might not fetch on command or follow a finger point, but their ability to track a scent through complex environments is unmatched. While they may rank low in obedience tests, they top the charts for instinctual intelligence, showcasing their unique talents in ways that obedience-focused breeds simply cannot replicate.
What This Means for Dog Owners
If you’re a dog owner, remember: intelligence is not one-size-fits-all. When we measure a dog’s intelligence solely based on their obedience to human commands, we ignore the richness of their natural abilities and instincts. Instead of asking, "Is my dog better than yours?" try asking, "What is my dog best at?"
Celebrate your dog’s strengths—whether they’re a hound with an exceptional nose, a collie with a knack for herding, or a retriever with a gentle mouth perfect for fetching. Every dog is unique, and understanding what makes them special is key to building a stronger bond and providing meaningful enrichment.
After all, the real measure of a dog isn’t their ability to fit into human-defined tests but how well they fulfill their own potential as the remarkable creatures they are.
Add comment
Comments